Malice and Malaise

The Earth is full of the fruits of malice. Malice is not just the “urge to kill” as noted in the last post. It is the harrassment, too, by the spammer and hacker or, for that matter, of the political ratfucker and ratfucking politics, which has become pretty much the norm of contemporary politics, being war by other means. It’s also cruelty in the treatment of animals. Malice, and the delight in malice, is what motivates the bigot and the fanatic equally.

What is the root of such malice? Why does malice seem so out of control today?

The Book of Genesis, and other legends of the Flood, has it that the Deluge occurred because the “imagination of men’s hearts” was full of malice continuously. The “imagination of the heart” is what we have been calling “intent” or intentionality. It doesn’t matter what I will. Perhaps I will to be “good” and to do good, at least as we understand “good”. But it does no good at all, and is quite fruitless in fact, if the “imagination of the heart” overrules what the ego nature wills. Hervey Cluckley’s “Mask of Sanity” is really a disguise for this deeper malaise or pathology — the “imagination of the heart” which is today, once again, full of malice. That’s pretty much the same theme as The Who’s song “Behind Blue Eyes” mentioned in the last post.

Is harbouring and nurturing malice in the imagination of the heart the “normal” and “natural” human condition or is it instead an aberrant and extraordinary one? Much of the “new normal” seems to involve the uninhibited expression of unmitigated barbarism, brutalism, and malice, all of which are excused and justified as being “perfectly natural”. Being “perfectly natural” is now considered to be a very good thing, even though the Three Evils of Buddhism — greed, malice, and ignorance — are all just “perfectly natural” too, as are Rumi’s four nafs or “animal spirits”.

The situation reflects Gebser’s observation that the growth in “technological feasibility” has outstripped and overtaken “man’s sense of responsibility”. Rosenstock calls it “our re-invasion by nature”.  If I tell someone that their act was “only natural”, I relieve them of responsibility for that act. The “natural” and the “responsible” have become antitheses. It’s one of the reasons Rosenstock chose respondeo, etsi mutabor — “I respond, although I will be changed” — as his formula for a new metanoia — or new mind. What does it mean to be responsible? We no longer even know that since “the death of God”.

What was “the Deluge” really? It was nihilism. In Genesis, the Abyss or Void or the Nihil or Chaos was not empty space, but water, water everywhere. The beginning of creation was the separation of “the waters above from the waters below”.

The Maya, apparently had a belief that while first world was destroyed by water, and the next would be destroyed by fire. I haven’t got the sinews for even contemplating what that could imply. Apparently, the four elements of Earth, Air, Fire, and Water will each take turns in time dominating and destroying the others as if anxious for all existence and being to return to the Nihil, the Void. In any event, world destruction by fire is also the dystopian hopelessness of books like Brunner’s The Sheep Look Up and Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, as well as the great fear of global warming.

Yeats’ “rough beast” with eye “blank and pitiless like the sun” is also an image of malice. Malice is the absence of empathy and, as you know, Gary Olson’s Empathy Imperiled is the flip side of Lasch’s Culture of Narcissism. Perhaps, if anything, we’ll have to come to learn the full price of harbouring malice.

 

Advertisements

3 responses to “Malice and Malaise”

  1. abdulmonem says :

    Thank you Scott for all the efforts you expend in clarifying the road to sanity and identifying the ills that are hindering the journey. Malice is the disease of the soul and malaise is the disease of the body and in combination they make the main obstacles in the self-realization of our inattentive humanity. It seems from the historical lessons that the perverted is not prone to correction without sever shock and thus the story goes according to all scriptures and the earth will be inherited by those who respect the divine reality.

    • Scott Preston says :

      It seems from the historical lessons that the perverted is not prone to correction without sever shock…

      That, sadly, appears to be the case now. So the inertia of events would seem to have it. The opportunity to avoid the crisis seems to have passed us by, and now we’re pretty much in the thick of it. “Quagmire”, as it’s being called.
      We might as well call it “the Postmodern Quagmire”.

  2. abdulmonem says :

    On the the nature of the divine reality I like to quote Ibn Arabi, It is he who is revealed in every face, sought in every sign, gazed upon by every eye, worshipped in every object and pursued in the unseen and the visible. Not a single one of his creatures can fail to find him in its primordial and original nature.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: