Our Task is Different

We shouldn’t focus too much on the decaying manifestations of the Modern Age in post-modernity which, in the American context, are represented in both Trump and Clinton, (or “the demagogue” and “the technocrat” as someone succinctly put it). The same thing is happening everywhere at our “end of history”, “new normal”, “post-truth society” or whatever you wish to call this strange universe we’ve entered into in which, quite literally, “mind is at the end of its tether” and the era of Universal Reason is disintegrating into incoherence and the fractiousness of infinite points-of-view all claiming universal validity.

Our task in this period of chaotic transition we call “post-modernity” is different, which is to work out a new foundation for truth, and for the common understanding of truth, which is presently in crisis. This task, the Great Work, is pretty challenging and demanding largely because we cannot trust, or rely upon, much in the way of precedent or in an allegiance to decayed models that are no longer effective (the problem of “zombie logic”). Our own task must be a double one of retrieval and transformation.

We acknowledge that the Modern Age is over, and that the ideals of an Age of Universal Reason have decayed into incoherence and “truthiness”. What otherwise is a “post-truth society” or “new normal” than that? The mental-rational consciousness, elaborated over the last 500 years, has undermined and devoured its own foundations and is leaving us with both a disaster but also an opportunity. Reformation has decayed into fundamentalism, while Renaissance has decayed into reductionism, both of which have become species of nihilism. And we should try to grab this “cubic centimeter of chance” (as Castaneda’s don Juan put it nicely) in the chaotic transition to articulate a new foundation, a new basis, for truth and shared truth.

We should salvage what we can from the wreckage of the Modern Age. It’s devotion to truth was admirable, even where its methods, which were only perspectivist, left much to be desired. It’s not that perspectivism or perspectivisation is false. It was just incomplete — a matter of Blake’s “Single Vision & Newtons sleep”. It aspired to something grand — Universality — but which it could not finally achieve because of its too narrow focus. So when Jean Gebser writes of our need for a truly “universal way of looking at things”, he is still paying homage to that grand vision, even when he understood very well why it was doomed to fail in the end because it had built its foundations of truth upon the mere shifting sands of the “point-of-view”.

There’s no question but that the heady optimism and enthusiasm that greeted Renaissance, Enlightenment, and Universal Reason has waned and decayed into cynicism and cynical reason, which, as Nietzsche well knew, was a symptom of decadence and the chief driver of the “devaluation of values” through which all higher values are debased. Gebser’s strategy is to retrieve from cynical reason that which is valuable, and to transform it through a “revaluation of values”.

This is the task of “revaluation” is what Nietzsche did not finish. It is, though, the task that Gebser took up from his study of Nietzsche.

This work of retrieval and transformation is the Hermetic “Great Work”. The transformation of lead into gold is a parable about revaluation of values, and is the work of the “integral consciousness”. It is just as much the meaning of Rosenstock-Huessy’s “grammatical method” as “metanoia” (or “new mind”). The very act of retrieval and transformation, or “revaluation of values”, is the meaning of the “plus mutation” of a consciousness structure.

In that sense, Universal Reason into Integral Consciousness (or the arational-aperspectival) is not a question of undoing Reason, but of adding to the ideal of Universal Reason a new dimension (or amension, as it were) that acts as a kind of leavening, fulfilling and transforming Reason itself. Like Rosenstock-Huessy’s “metanoia“, this additional “dimension” is the admission of the quality of Time. This admission of time into the mental-rational leads to what Rosenstock-Huessy calls “universal history” which is, actually, in many respects the equivalent of Gebser’s notion of “time-freedom”.

“It’s the Universal, Jim. But not as we know it!” Indeed it is not as we know it. Gebser’s “universal way of looking at things” and Rosenstock-Huessy’s “universal history” are pretty much the same. “Transnational Revolution” and “universal history” are pretty much synonymous in Rosenstock-Huessy’s view (not to be construed as the obsolescence of nations either). In both Gebser’s and Rosenstock-Huessy’s works “universal” is only truly realised by the addition of Time to thinking, and this addition corresponds with a consciousness mutation or metanoia in which the Universal is revalued to mean the Integral. This “transnational revolution” should not be confused with “capitalist globalisation” and least of all with what is only reactionary nationalism or nativism. It’s one of the reasons why some people are at pains to distinguish between “globalism” and “globalisation”, or, put differently, between global integration and global imperialism.

The addition of time disrupts the perspectivist consciousness, which is space-oriented by virtue of the fact that its “ratio” is a ratio of spaces — the three dimensions. Gebser is fond of quoting St. Augustine’s remark that “time is of the soul”, and it is indeed one of the reasons that along with the “discovery” of the fourth “dimension”, the “soul” is making a comeback in contemporary literature as well and which is really the issue of “the return of the repressed”.

“It’s the Soul, Jim! But not as we know it!” Bones’ befuddlement, perplexity and cynicism is precisely right for the type. “It’s Society, Jim! But not as we know it!” Or, how about, “It’s Consciousness, Jim! But not as we know it!”

(I could have a lot of fun with Bones’ befuddlement. At least Bones has an inkling of something, while Kirk would probably blast it and Spock would calculate the odds).

It is, in a sense, quite true that, as Ecclesiastes put it, “there is nothing new under the sun”. The Book of Ecclesiastes has been called an “enigma” in the same sense that Heraclitus was described as “the Dark” or “the Obscure”. Ecclesiastes (which means “the Preacher”) is the Jewish Heraclitus or Lao Tse, for that matter. History has been a series of retrievals and transformations, a series of devaluations and revaluations that correspond to mutations in consciousness structure; or, if you want to use a contemporary idiom, the entropic and the neg-entropic otherwise called “death-pole” and “life-pole”, or thanatic and erotic, or whatever. There are eternal verities as those things that belong to the “ever-present origin”, only they undergo continuous metamorphoses, they die and are resurrected in new forms. That’s essentially the meaning of “the more things change, the more they stay the same”. This is connected with the “eternal recurrence of same”, only this is badly misunderstood.

Retrieval and transformation. That’s the ticket to surviving chaotic transition. We have no wish to attack modernity nor to defend it, which is about the only thing people presently seem to know how to do. Our task is to transform it.

 

Advertisements

3 responses to “Our Task is Different”

  1. donsalmon says :

    Speaking of what to do, I just got my copy of Baruss’ “Transcendent Mind.” It’s a bit all over the place, reviving Frederick Myers’ “Filter theory” (James and Myers proposed that rather than materialism – the brain produces thought; or dualism – mind and matter are two wholly different “substances” – a world permeated by n infinite, boundless Consciousness may be “individualized” and expressed through the vehicle of the brain (which itself is a manifestation of Consciousness). The individual brain, then, acts as a filter for this universal Consciousness. Baruss (like Kastrup, who has done marvelous work on this) cites a number of studies (particularly on near death experiences) showing that consciousness may actually be clearer/more free when brain activity is lowered.

    Meditators have known this for thousands of years (Yoga Sutras, I, 3rd sutra: when the minds activities are stilled, the Seer (Purusha, Atman, individualized Brahman) is recognized in all its glory. 4th sutra: when the minds activities (vrittis) begin again, there is a tendency for the Seer to identify with the phenomena of the mind.

    Research in brain injuries, meditation, and psychedelics shows this as well.

    I really can’t get over what an epoch making event the publication of Baruss’ book is. The first book I saw like this was Dean Radin’s “Conscious Universe” in 1997 (of course, there was Chalmers’ article on the Hard Problem of Consciousness in the December 1995 issue of Scientific American).

    The next one didn’t come along till 2015 – ed Kelly’s “Beyond Physicalism.” Kelly’s book is actually much more sophisticated philosophically, but it’s too all over the place (in a way, actually, more integral, less simply rational) to have the kind of impact I think Baruss’ book will.

    Personally, I think Gebser and Aurobindo have much more to say overall for the era to come, but for this decade and perhaps the next, this is incredibly important stuff.

    Someone then has to take the scientific revolution and show what a profound effect it will have on the entire economic and political spectrum, throughout the world.

    Scott, we’re eagerly waiting for it:>)))))

  2. Scott Preston says :

    I’ll have to catch up with the authors you mentioned. But I have no new “master plan” for how people will eventually organise their political and economic affairs in the future. I suspect there will be a great diversity of such things, and a lot of experimentation. Some will be successful and some won’t.

    Charles Eisenstein has some views on that (haven’t read them yet). Peter Pogany’s “Rethinking the World” has some views on that (I haven’t finished reading it yet). Rudolf Steiner wrote quite a lot about “the Social Question” in a few books that I haven’t yet read either. There’s Callenbach’s Ecotopia which I haven’t read.

    But for the most part, I think the future organisation of society will be a quite spontaneous affair, a process of exploration and discovery by different groups, and not something according to a plan or model or as something preconceived, but very much in the manner natural ecologies form. In that sense, I think the term “spontaneity” is going to be very descriptive of what the future holds once that spontaneity is released from the shackles of “Single vision” and Urizenic rationality.

    Spontaneity: that’s pretty much what Nietzsche meant in saying “the will to a system is a lack of integrity”. If Urizenic Man is shackled, by contrast Albion is very spontaneous.

  3. abdulmonem says :

    All sages agree irrespective of their boxes that silencing the chatter of the restless self is the proved door to him to the world of higher and integral consciousness but this higher consciousness is demonstrated differently in light of the capacity, the preparation, the receptivity, the presence and the sincerity of the seeker without forgetting the grace of god who distributes his bounty differently. If only we pay attention to the world around us. It is a time of essential change where the spiritual members of the world meet,.All religions need to go beyond their historical landscape to ward more wide-ranging embrace of a truly spiritual quest recognizing the mistakes committed by the different religions and culture and move beyond. Life without forgiveness is worthless,that is life without god ( the code of values) is utterly worthless. I like to end by Audon visionary statement that, We lived by powers, we pretend to understand.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: