Our Post-Truth Era and Coincidentia Oppositorum

When Francis Bacon, one of the founders of the Modern Age now in decay, was trying to decide between science or magic for man’s conquest of Nature, and came down on the side of science, or “natural philosophy”, what he was really testing for in terms of method were two forms of logic.

By “magic” was meant alchemy, of course, but more to the point it was the Hermetic Philosophy as “theory” underlying alchemy as praxis.  These two, “natural philosophy” (and its praxis science) and Hermetic Philosophy, contested for man’s mind during the Renaissance. Essentially, though, the former was dualistic and the latter was non-dualistic, and at issue was the law of noncontradiction in logic that was accepted since Aristotle, at least. That is to say, paradox. One form of logic, “natural reason”, did not admit the validity of the paradoxical (which was considered a “monstrosity”). The Hermetic, on the other hand, not only did allow for the paradox, but positively reveled in it as coincidentia oppositorum or coniunctio oppositorum — the coincidence or conjunction of the opposites.

As it turns out, life and reality are very paradoxical indeed, as the Uncertainty Principle and the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics attests, to the embarrassment of our received logic. And admitting the paradoxical nature of life and reality really upsets the apple cart. The dichotomistic or dualistic reasoning of the last few hundred years has been faulty and misleading. The real world really does violate the law of noncontradiction, and this poses a distinct problem for the mental-rational (perspectivist) consciousness, which it is having great difficulty dealing with.

“The stone that the builders rejected has become the keystone”, as the New Testament puts it, and Hermeticism is back in vogue, particularly the doctrine of the affinities, of the coincidence of opposites, and what is presently called “enantiodromia” or reversal at the extremity. Some are even referring to themselves as “the New Alchemists”.

The paradoxical character of life, time, and the cosmos is now asserting itself and expressing itself through a consciousness structure that is inhospitable to the paradoxical. This is experienced as a stress or pressure on the old dialectical consciousness structure, and much of this makes for the features and symptoms of “chaotic transition” and madhouse Earth. What distinguishes Jean Gebser and Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy (and William Blake), among others, from the pack is their free admission of the paradoxical into their thinking, transforming that thinking. And it is in those terms that we speak of them as “apocalyptic thinkers”.

Things would go much easier for us if we were to embrace the paradoxical and the coincidentia oppositorum.

It’s in those terms, too, that I’ld like to recast “Post-Truth Society” as also being a coincidence of opposites, and that epidemic of duplicity in our time is fulfilling Gebser’s expectations for the “irruption” of a new consciousness structure, or what Gebser calls “the double-movement”. This, I hold, is reflected in our “Four Riders”, as I’ve called them: Double-Talk, Double-Think, Double-Standard, and Double-Bind. I’m sure you have noted this yourselves. It’s a gruesome thing, this vivisection of the soul, but I do hold that all this duplicity is a consequence of the irruption of the paradox into a consciousness structure (the perspectival that characterises the Modern Era) that cannot handle paradox effectively, and in those terms becomes “deficient”.

It is in those terms, too, that we can learn to appreciate “post-truth” as a restructuration of truth and logic, however chaotic the process and one that will take on features of madness and insanity as consciousness and identity are deeply affected by it. In fact, I would say that the present epidemic of seemingly irrational paranoias is a manifestation of the paradoxical as it asserts itself through a consciousness structure that is resistant and inhospitable to the paradoxical.

2500 years ago, approximately, at the dawn of philosophy, two men, who were philosophical foes, contended for the soul of philosophy and subsequently the Western mind (and not just the Western mind): Parmenides and Heraclitus — the philosopher of Being and the philosopher of Becoming, respectively. For 2500 years, it was Parmenides who ruled the roost, and Heraclitus (the “Greek Buddha”, as Rosenstock-Huessy called him) who was dismissed as “Heraclitus the Dark” or “Heraclitus the Obscure”. Heraclitus, however, (who was also called “the Weeping Philosopher”) was the master of the paradoxical, and it is now he who has the last laugh on Parmenides. The cosmos is energetic flux and paradox, and this insight, this “new” reality, works like a solvent on 2500 years of Western intellectual tradition that followed Parmenides (for it was Parmenides who first said, before Descartes’ “I think, therefore I am”, that “thinking and being are the same”. Heraclitus contradicted him with his doctrine of panta rhei: “everything flows” and is continuously changing into its opposite (enantiodromia).

If 2500 years of Western intellectual tradition is about to be overthrown, this is no small potatoes (and for Blake, it was the last 6,000 years, corresponding to the founding of cities in the Fertile Crescent). That which we think of as our “identity”, all bound up as it is with historical notions of “human nature”, is going to be severely pressured and impacted by this. Identities are going to splinter and shatter. “Human nature” is going to splinter and shatter. Fun stuff like that.

And which, I suppose, we are already witnessing. A lot of people, everywhere, seem to be losing their marbles without knowing why they are losing their marbles, or even realising that they are losing their marbles.

Don’t lose your marbles. It’s just a transition.


17 responses to “Our Post-Truth Era and Coincidentia Oppositorum

  1. Steve Lavendusky says :

    All things are differentiations of One Infinity
    Everything Changes; nothing is stationary
    All antagonisms are complementary
    All phenomena are unique; there is nothing identical
    All phenomena have a front and back
    The greater the front, the greater the back
    All phenomena have a beginning and an end.

    One infinity manifests itself into the two universal tendencies of Yin and Yang; complementary and antagonistic poles of endless change.
    Yin and Yang are arising continuously out of the ceaseless eternal movement of One Infinite Universe.
    Yin appears as centrifugalilty, Yang appears as centripetalilty. The activities of Yin and Yang together create energy and all phenomena.
    Yin attracts Yang . Yang attracts Yin.
    Yin repels Yin. Yang repels Yang.
    Yin and Yang combine in an infinite variety of proportion, creating an infinite variety of phenomena. The strength of attraction or repulsion always represents the degree of difference or similarity.
    All phenomena are relative and ephemeral, constantly changing their direction towards more Yin or more Yang.
    Nothing is solely Yin or absolutely Yang. Everything is created by both tendencies together.
    There is no neutrality; either Yin or Yang is always dominating.
    Great Yin attracts small Yin. Great Yang attracts small yang.
    Yin, at the extreme point, changes into Yang. Yang, at the extreme point, changes into Yin.
    Yang always focuses towards the center. Yin always diffuses toward the periphery.

  2. Scott Preston says :

    How the worm turns. How over confident Fukuyama was in declaring the end of history and the historical triumph of liberal democracy, and how tenuous now liberal democracy is, everywhere


    Biggest example of “ironic reversal” I can think of. The march of folly continues.

  3. Scott Preston says :

    One thing you hope that Trump will backpedal on, but probably won’t, is his threat to use the powers of the state, especially the state surveillance apparatus, against his political foes and opponents.


  4. Scott Preston says :

    Canada now has its own Trump-wannabe in the form of Kellie Leitch, running for leadership of the Conservative Party


  5. davidm58 says :

    I like it! Where did you find this? From a Macrobiotics magazine?

  6. abdulmonem says :

    In line of the spirit of the post that calls for an urgent move from the mechanical philosophy to the hermetic philosophy,, that is the sphere of the revelatory knowledge in order to reroute the march of the post-truth society which is heading to the abyss. After all what is after truth but destructive lie. I like to make my comment in the context of the language of revelation.
    First, there is the divine primordial force that set all kind of forces in motion in order to accomplish the purpose of existence.
    Second there are two antagonistic forces, the positive angelic forces that attract the humans to the divine center and the negative satanic forces that work to push the humans away from the divine center. The two forces that are fighting for the humans souls.
    Third there is the humans who are endowed with the two forces that Goethe talked about, the one that moves the humans to the angelic positive center and the other moves them to the negative satanic center.
    Fourth, no matter what we coin of words or concepts, trying to understand our selves or our environment, the basic always remain the same that is why we have what they call the perennial philosophy,the integral consciousness.
    Fifth,religious language is simple and it is programmed to be accessible to every human, in opposition to the mathematical language which is confined to the few or the philosophical language which is diffusing and dispersive and has no one path like the one path to god preached by all prophets and sages.
    Sixth, the only road to the one is the road of truth, honesty and justice. The purpose of all prophets is to correct the lies perpetrated by the falsifiers of the divine words.
    Seventh, it seems the cycles of the ups and downs never stop until the humans learn the lesson,that there is a god and that humans are students in the divine school to prove themselves either negatively or positively and that there is nothing god has created in vain and we are returning to him to verify the truth delivered by the prophets.
    Eighth, it is a question of faith whether in the realm of mechanical idols or in the hermetic path of god, and each party with receive their dues.

  7. Scott Preston says :

    Your comment very much reflects the same Yin Yang forces that Steve has posted in the comment above, particularly in respect of your second point

    ” the positive angelic forces that attract the humans to the divine center and the negative satanic forces that work to push the humans away from the divine center. The two forces that are fighting for the humans souls.”

    That is the centripetal and centrifugal

  8. davidm58 says :

    FYI, my latest post at Integral Permaculture was partially inspired by the comments above…and another parted devoted to the “Post-Truth” theme often referenced on this blog. You might notice it in the “trackbacks/pingbacks” but here is the easy link:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: