How Did Reality Get So Unreal?

Or, as documentary filmmaker Adam Curtis calls it “hypernormalisation” where things stop making sense, or when nonsense becomes the new common sense which we are calling “the New Normal” — the absurd, the surreal, the “post-rational”, “post-truth” and so on.

It’s not something that has happened quite suddenly. It’s been creeping up on us for the last few decades. Plenty of writers, starting around the late 50s, have been firing warning shots across our bow. But the “post-modern condition” — whose central theme is the “end of the Grand Narrative” or “end of the Master Narrative” (which follows upon Nietzsche’s “death of God”) — is certainly implicated.

It’s certainly not the first time in history that a “Grand Narrative” has disintegrated into incoherence and chaos. The waning of the Middle Ages — of Christendom and Holy Roman Empire — was also just such a decoherence of a Master Narrative — the “authority of Scripture” — into sect and schism, all competing with one another — often violently — to establish themselves as the new “Grand Narrative”. It’s what lies behind Shakespeare’s remarks also about “times out of joint” and is the manifest correlate to Jean Gebser’s anticipation of the “disintegration” of the modern “mental-rational consciousness structure”.

What eventually triumphed over the “authority of Scripture” as Grand Narrative was “the Clockwork Universe” — the root ruling idea that informs Lewis Mumford’s notion of “the Megamachine”, and embodied in the form of “Universal Reason”. It was a pretty radical change from the notion of God as the author of the Scriptures to the Architect and Engineer of the Clockwork Universe or cosmic Megamachine. That’s what is depicted in the famous woodcut Urbi et Orbi


Urbi et Orbi

Right there is a visual representation of “the disenchantment of the world” in the change from one Grand Narrative to another Grand Narrative (or Metanarrative).

Today, as then, we have many “mini-Narratives” all competing with one another for “hearts and minds”, as well as reactionary attempts to re-legitimise and restore the older Grand Narratives.

What a Master Narrative is, in effect, is the ruling myth of a particular consciousness structure, and is the express form of that structure. The ruling myth of the modern consciousness structure (the perspectival or mental-rational) happens to be the Clockwork Universe (which is an interpretation of the meaning of time) and its reflection in the social order as “Megamachine” (or “System”, equivalently, Ginsberg’s “Moloch” or Varoufakis’s “Global Minotaur”). The Clockwork Universe is also what we call “Newtonian” or “Newtonian-Cartesian”, which is a model of the cosmos (and of human beings too) that has become untenable.

Master Narratives provide orientation (meaning, purpose, the “common sense”, what is considered “real” or true) for all members of society. This Master Narrative is quite evidently breaking down, which is why people today speak of the “multiversity” rather than the “university”. There is now no common (or universal) framework for estimating knowledge, or for evaluating what is “real” (in its terms) from what is unreal (in its terms).  That’s one of the reasons the contemporary Maimonides, E.F. Schumacher, wrote his Guide for the Perplexed. (Also a significant resource for students of Gebser or Rosenstock-Huessy).

(It is completely necessary for the God of the Clockwork Universe — the Architect of the Megamachine — to die. William Blake anticipated this long before Nietzsche pronounced it — the demise of “Urizen”, Architect of the Ulro).

It’s in the face of this disintegration and decoherence of the Master Narrative that efforts like Jean Gebser’s cultural philosophy (a new “universal way of looking at things”) or Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy’s quest for a “Universal History” should be understood, or other attempts to come up with a new “Universe Story”. The old one, which forms the background and supporting foundation for practically everything we think and do, has become “deficient”, in Gebser’s terms.

It’s quite simple to understand, in principle. The Clockwork Universe meme and myth no longer functions very well, and really “the God that Failed” was, finally, Blake’s Urizen, Architect of the Megamachine. It provided the sense of the familiar, the certain, the predictable, the “common sense” which it is no longer capable of doing because something is happening to the nature of “time” itself, especially an emerging conflict between lifetime and machine time.

When you consider St. Augustine’s remark that “time is of the soul” (a remark that buttresses Gebser’s cultural philosophy of consciousness structures) it’s completely understandable how the Clockwork Universe culminates in Mumford’s “Megamachine” (the Juggernaut) and in Lewis Yablonski’s Robopathy. Consequently, too, the problem of “zombie logic”, which is our apparent inability to free ourselves from the straight-jacket of mechanical time and transcend its compulsions. But that’s perhaps the chief promise of Gebser’s integral consciousness — “time-freedom”.

So, the end of modernity’s Master Narrative is not at all something to be anxious about, as so many seem to be today. It may be deeply disorienting and disruptive (and that’s pretty much the meaning of “chaotic transition”)  but it’s all about time, and how lifetime has been so arranged and organised to favour and embellish, not life, but the requirements and dictates of the machine — the clockwork, the original “dark Satanic Mill” of Blake’s disdain.

As Gebser notes, ages of transition historically all involve a restructuring of space and time and a correlative restructuring of consciousness. It raises the interesting question (perhaps a chicken or egg question) whether space and time are still, themselves, evolving and mutating, and not just our understanding and interpretation of space and time (some people have made the argument for the former — that, in fact, space and time are continuing to evolve and mutate, and that our thinking is always playing catch-up with an ever-mutating, ever-evolving reality.

Gebser (and Carl Jung) wouldn’t put it that way. For them it is synchronous. Jungian “synchronicity” is the same “acausal connecting principle” that corresponds to the idea of co-evolutionary relation between cosmos and psyche or cosmos and consciousness. Or, as the Hermetic Philosophy puts it — the coincidentia oppositorum of “as above, so below”.  For Gebser (and for Rosenstock-Huessy) any particular spacetime matrix is identical with a consciousness structure — they are part of the same life-world, and in those terms there are indeed species of consciousness. Therefore, identities evolve and mutate as well, but some people find that profoundly disturbing.



12 responses to “How Did Reality Get So Unreal?”

  1. Steve Lavendusky says :

    “Maybe this world is another planet’s hell.”

    ― Aldous Huxley

    • Steve Lavendusky says :

      Eugene Rosenstock Huessy writes in The Christian Future (1946), people believe that all large organizations are “rational, legal, and mechanical” as well as “logical and systematic.” At the center of modern institutions, “there stands a typewriter” (a machine, and specifically a machine for generating plans and reports). Moderns are puzzled by the “perfectly unsystematic, irrational, antilogical” institution, “the poorest organization on earth” but yet “fully alive”¯the family, which to the modern mentality seems a “colorful folly.” At the center of the family is not a typewriter but “a bed and a stove”; the “unquenchable illogicality” of the family perturbs planners with a blueprint for the future.

    • Scott Preston says :

      Huxley maybe not that far wrong. Seth, in a memorable statement, once said that we’re already as dead now as we are ever going to get. I’m not sure whether we are to take that as reassuring or not.

  2. Charles says :

    Good writing Scott.
    Steve, I always enjoyed Huxley. Are you familiar with his friend Gerald Heard? He was a prolific writer about all these concerns. His books Five Ages of Man and Pain, Sex and Time are both insightful about the present context.

    Good question Scott- How did reality…unreal?

    • Steve Lavendusky says :

      I am familiar with Gerald Heard. I was turned on to him by reading about W.H. Auden. It seems Heard was and influence on Auden in his younger life and Rosenstock Huessy was and influence on him in his older life. Not bad. I think the Five Ages of Man is truly a work of genius.

      • Charles says :

        I agree. I am reading Jean Houston’s Life Force – The Psycho-Historical Recovery of the Self and Heard’s Five Ages is one of her inspirations. I feel the book is an insightful history of how the present developed.

    • Scott Preston says :

      It’s like that cartoon “Bizarro” — a caricature world.

      Oddly enough, this morning I looked up “Bizarro” on Google, and discovered that its original creator, Alvin Schwarz, created it as an homage to Carl Jung’s “Shadow” — a mirror world. The Shadow, too, is a human caricature. And there you have your “Alice Through the Looking Glass” theme. Bizarro is an interesting construction because so many people today are, in fact, writing about the Shadow (or Wendigo, Mr. Hyde, Lynch’s “Bob” in his “Twin Peaks”) and so on.

      Yeah. It’s like we’ve gone through the looking glass ourselves and found ourselves in Bizarro (or Wonderland) where everything has become a caricature of itself.

      • Scott Preston says :

        Bizarro, by the way, also brings to mind Sheldon Wolin’s notion of “Inverted Totalitarianism” (which is, in some ways, just another way of speaking of the Shadow), ie, “managed democracy” being itself a caricature of democracy

        Speaking of “Bob” from Twin Peaks (I watched the DVD’s of the first series) , there is a real life precedent for him (not just Mr. Hyde in Stevenson’s tale). It was the quantum physicist Wolfgang Pauli, who had quite a spectacular “dark side” for which he sought help from Carl Jung. That’s recorded in Arthur Miller’s Deciphering the Cosmic Number: The Strange Friendship of Carl Jung and Wolfgang Pauli.

        The loss of reality is “The Fear” that Lily Allen sings about in her song by that title (which I discussed earlier). She stated so explicitly in an interview I watched on YouTube about the song, so that also pertains to “Bizarro’s World”.

        Which raises the interesting question: Is “the Anthropocene” really “Bizarro’s World”? It sure is beginning to look like it — a caricature reality, a looking glass world..

  3. abdulmonem says :

    Thank you all. David Bohm as it is known is a man after meaning. He said meaning is the fundamental aspect of the whole of existence . Meaning is not concerned with things but with processes or actions.Thoughts are our tools to express meaning, We unfold thoughts and we are enfolded by thoughts and in theses processes we either move from the real to the unreal or from the unreal to the real. We are a field for the interactions of thoughts and of transformation by these thoughts either toward the higher self or the lower self. Repentance is a reminder of such transformation, thus we have to be careful as to the thoughts we produce or thoughts we receive. It seems the human has a critical mind and responsible for his action and one should not move in the boats of thoughts without stopping to grasp and pick the suitable meaning that helps us to move forward. Perversion is a transforming force that moves those who respond to it positively to the a bode of the unreal, like the innocent Lily who has fallen under the spell of perverse thoughts. May god protects us from the visitation of the perverse thoughts that sneak to our field under the shadow of the light. Dialogue is a constructive tool that helps to enhance self-understanding, Thant you for the opportunity.

  4. Dwig says :

    Back to David Abrams: in “Spell of the Sensuous”, he makes the point repeatedly that the separation of time and space was a consequence of the transition from the oral to the written culture. He describes several indigenous societies that have no such distinction in their languages. Perhaps one aspect of “integration” will be the “reconciliation” between these two world-views (time freedom?).

  5. abdulmonem says :

    Last night I was listening to Jude Carrivan on youtube speaking about the centrality of information in the whole existence and the unified reality. An interview that deserves the attention of the group. It is indicative of the epiphany Gebser and others speak of.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: