The Wings of Perception: Castaneda, Blake, Gebser

For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro’ narrow chinks of his cavern” — William Blake

“Unfolding the wings of perception” is a lovely phrase, I came across it in one of Castaneda’s books. This was essentially what Castaneda’s teacher, who he calls “don Juan”, was attempting to teach him and which don Juan described as “seeing“. We may say that this “seeing” is what Blake knew of when he wrote that “A fool sees not the same tree that a wise man sees”. It is the seeing of the Seer — a mode of perception that is direct and immediate, which is to say not mediated by the personal or “collective representations”. It is the mode referred to as “insight”.

What hinders us here? What are the impediments and obstacles to our “unfolding of the wings of perception”? It’s pretty clear that this unfolding (or “e-volution”) is also the reality of what Jean Gebser calls “diaphaneity” or “the transparency of the world” in his The Ever-Present Origin.

A basic premise of The Chrysalis is that narcissism is the human condition, and seems to be the inevitable fate and challenge of creatures such as ourselves who become self-aware. It’s a matter of degree and, in many cases, can become quite pathological. This fall into the stupor of narcissistic consciousness is what we understand by Blake’s statement above, that “man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro’ narrow chinks of his cavern“. This condition we might describe as a thickening or reification of the ego-consciousness. Virtually all our problems presently arise from this thickening which we now call “narcissism” following the myth of Narcissus and Echo.

If we expect to overcome and transcend this miserable state and the problems it generates for us, we need, of course, to understand it. We expend an enormous amount of energy embellishing and defending this narcissistic self when that energy could be put to far better, more creative, and healthier uses.

In earlier posts, we described narcissism as the confusion of the “true self” or identity with what is only the conditioned self-image or self-representation, which we described as a “phantom”. If there is a real concern with a seeming loss of “the ground of being” it is because we have overidentified with this phantom called “the false self”, as it is called in some circles. Our contemporary concerns with authenticity and the lack of it are a reflection of our realisation that this “self” has no foundation, and is little more than a dungeon in the air and a spider’s web spinning incredible fantasies about itself and its reality.

Narcissism is what Gebser means by our “distantiation” from the “vital centre” when he writes that “when any movement tends to the extremes it leads away from the center or nucleus toward eventual destruction at the outer limits where the connections to the life-giving center finally are severed.” This was of course, the fate of Narcissus in the myth from which we derive the word “narcissism” and it is the fate of what Christopher Lasch earlier described in his book The Culture of Narcissism.

For what it’s worth, though, the best book I have read on narcissism and its transformation is A.H. Almaas’s superb and supremely insightful book The Point of Existence: Transformations of Narcissism in Self-Realization. It is very thorough on this issue and makes a fine companion volume to Jean Gebser’s The Ever-Present Origin.

Here, though, we are faced with something of a paradox, and it is a paradox reflected in the times we live in. The term “narcissism” is scarcely a century or so old, meaning it became notable and noticeable only in the late 19th and early 20th century — precisely the time when the yoga doctrine attests that we were leaving the spiritual dark age of the Kaliyuga and entering into the new age of the Dwaparayuga (as discussed earlier). We might even say that narcissism is the chiefest feature of the Kaliyuga. But the fact that it did become notable and noticeable attests to what is already a certain degree of detachment from the condition, signifying that — to a certain degree at least — the ego-consciousness was becoming more transparent to itself in some quarters.

Needless to say though, this increasing transparency of the ego consciousness and its narcissistic state is not welcome in all quarters, where it is even considered an existential threat leading to rage. Again, Almaas is brilliant in showing how this rage is connected with the deluded attempt to protect the narcissistic ego consciousness and the great anxiety about its dissolution which is, for Gebser, connected with the “irruption” also of a new form of consciousness.

If narcissistic delusion characterised the Kaliyuga, a “natural clairvoyance” characterises the new age called the Dwaparayuga, according to the Yoga doctrine. This fortuitous description corresponds to “unfolding the wings of perception” (or seeing in Castaneda’s works), and to what Jean Gebser calls “diaphaneity” or “the transparency of the world” and is also described by Blake as his own “New Age” in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell.

One of the merits of reading Almaas’s work with his own students in overcoming this narcissistic thickening of the ego-consciousness is that their personal path is an exact reflection of what can be expected from the culture and the society and the civilisation as a whole as we transition into this new age. The whole is reflected in the part and vice versa. Almaas refers to the narcissistic self as “the shell”, which is very fragile, but which we might refer to equally as “the cocoon” in keeping with the theme of The Chrysalis.

The discomfort, anxiety, even rage of some of Almaas’s students in their own transition beyond narcissistic consciousness (or the emancipation of the “Essential Identity” already encased and ensnared within it) can be expected to follow the pattern of the culture as a whole. This is what makes The Point of Existence a very worthwhile read.

19 responses to “The Wings of Perception: Castaneda, Blake, Gebser”

  1. Scott Preston says :

    Interesting article. Quite supportive of Iain McGilchrist’s work (although McGilchrist isn’t mentioned in it at all)

    https://getpocket.com/explore/item/the-mystery-of-why-some-people-become-sudden-geniuses

  2. steve says :

    We must all
    Endure dark times and onsets of winter.
    No person born but has
    Storms, barren branches, and darkness.

    We should know that always and everywhere
    The seed is under the snow,
    Waiting,
    And always it thrusts up, unfolding in the garden.

    Each one
    Has sat with curtains drawn against winter.

    Each one has thought then
    The bleakness and cold never-ending.

    Listen to the summer music !
    The sea is blue again, the grass is green.

    George Mackay Brown

  3. Steve says :

    The awakening consciousness is a danger; and whoever lives
    among conscious Europeans knows in fact that it is an illness.

    Nietzsche

  4. steve says :

    Scott… A book you might appreciate. It’s called, THE DEATH OF MERLIN: ARTHURIAN MYTH AND ALCHEMY by W.J. Stein. I have loaded up some Stein before on this blog which you liked. You said in some ways he reminded you of Rosenstock-Huessy.

  5. Scott Preston says :

    Lacked a bit of focus on its main theme and was sort of meandering at times.

    • Scott Preston says :

      I read the book, mainly to see where there was conjunctions with Rosenstock-Huessy’s speech philosophy. Compare, for example, Rosenstock-Huessy’s insistence that “speech is cosmic process” or “the energies of social life are compressed into words” (or speech). Then the diagramme accompanying your link reveals wherein the essential conjunction is to be found.

      Also here the intersection with Gebser’s consciousness structures as being essentially grammatical structures and then correlate that with Yogananda’s view that enlightenment is to arrive at that place where speech arises — cosmic dawn, as it were, or Blake’s “eternity’s sunrise”. It all correlates.

  6. steve says :

    This is a quote from a book I have called, “Stonehouse’s Poems for Zen Monks.”

    “For the next nine years, Stonehouse studied with two of the great Zen masters of the time: Koa-feng in the Tienmu Mountains west of Hangchou and Koa-feng’s student Chi-an on Mount Chienyang across the Yangtze from Nanching. Just as he gave up,Stonehouse finally broke through the self constructed prison we call “knowledge’ and discovered “living words” free of conceptual limitations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: